Gibson theory of perception is easily summer up with the phrase ”what you see is what you get” as the information available in the environment is substantial enough to be able to understand it. 

Hi Molly I am a psychology teacher and exam marker over several exam boards. Let me know if you need some help? 

Gibson’s theory is a highly ecologically valid theory as it puts perception back into the real world. A large number of applications can be applied in terms of his theory e.g. training pilots, runway markings and road markings. It’s an excellent explanation for perception when viewing conditions are clear. Gibson’s theory also highlights the richness of information in optic array and provides an account of perception in animals, babies and humans.

His theory is reductionist as it seeks to explain perception solely in terms of the environment. There is strong evidence to show that the brain and long term memory can influence perception. In this case, it could be said that Gregory’s theory is far more plausible.

Gibson’s theory also only supports one side of the nature nurture debate, that being the nature side. Again, Gregory’s theory is far more plausible as it suggests that what we see with our eyes is not enough and we use knowledge already stored in our brain, supporting both sides of the debate.

What is an A03 of Gibson’s direct theory of perception?

Similar Science questions

What is Q&A on Scoodle?